skip to main |
skip to sidebar
News and articles of personal interest.
網誌存檔
-
▼
2008
(120)
-
▼
1月
(29)
- Is This The End of Cheap Food?
- 無標題
- China-Taiwan Showdown Involves Politics, PCs
- Common Yet Different Democracies
- Undemocratic KMT
- A Beautfiul Country
- Taiwanese Be Proud
- DPP Loss Part of Democratic Process
- Voting Democracy Away
- Use Your Horsepower Sense, Buy Used.
- Unsung Victims of Dollar Diplomacy
- Chinese Predators and Local Ennui
- Happiness is a Good Job
- Whither the DPP?
- 無標題
- Voting for Taiwan's Demise
- Politicians May Need to Step Back to Go Forward
- "Media Slaves" Bow to Their Masters
- Rejecting the Tools of Democracy
- Taiwan Needs a Green Legislature
- Just What the KMT Mean by "Scared"?
- China Makes Another Miscalculation
- Economy, Geopolitics Guide Oil Price
- What's Really Bothering Beijing?
- Obama's Victory Speech in Iowa
- How to Cash in on a Warming Planet
- Some Financial New Year's Resolutions
- $100 Oil Will Hit Gas and Airfare
- Reluctant Retirement Savers May Be Scared Straight...
-
▼
1月
(29)
1 則留言:
the following paragraphs are quoted from 白木怡言 the blog of 蔣友柏. after I read that, thinking about Obama's speech again, I can really find the difference between two countries' election culture...
●「去蔣」
剛開始聽到「去蔣」這個詞的時候，我個人做為蔣家的一份子，難免會有一點感傷；但是當我仔細去看這件事的時候，那「一點感傷」很快就消失無蹤了。
我很快就發覺好像綠營的人沒有人在講「去蔣」，反而「去蔣」、「去中國化」這些詞都是藍營的人在講的。我最近幾年的觀察，民進黨與國民黨不習慣也不懂得用正面的方式來操作競選策略，每次到了選舉，這兩個黨用的都是負面的策略；他們沒辦法帶給選民「hope」，卻很會操作「fear」；綠營總是不斷地提醒民眾以前國民黨時代做的一些錯事，國民黨政權如何在中國大陸戰敗、如何在台灣實施獨裁統治、二二八、白色恐怖、美麗島事件，一連串抗爭、犧牲追求民主的歷史過程，不斷地重複向選民提醒那一段歲月，勾起他們不愉快的回憶，再把這一段不愉快的回憶跟國民黨畫上等號。而藍營的選舉策略也是一樣，不斷地提醒他們的選民，說什麼民進選贏了就會「去蔣」、「去中國化」、把外省人趕走、把軍方眷村和公務員的福利取消 …等等，兩黨全部都是操作「fear」的策略來恐嚇選民把票投給他們。
張貼留言